After four episodes of build-up, it’s time for Amy and Rory Pond to leave Doctor Who. Much like Billie Piper or David Tennant, they leave after a lengthy run, just need a good departure for us to remember them fondly.
So, did The Angels Take Manhattan deliver? Obviously, there will be spoilers, so check it out on iPlayer first.
The Inverse Takes Manhattan
This episode was more notable for what it wasn’t, to be honest. Some things it wasn’t: a massive world-ending apocalypse which happens to unseat the companion, the culmination of many ongoing subplots, an overburdened mess of continuity, a raft of emotional manipulation.
And don’t get me wrong, that’s a positive point, because I was expecting at least two of those things. To be honest, The Angels Take Manhattan felt like a well-constructed standard episode of Doctor Who, a good normal adventure… which suddenly wipes out two companions at the end.
The perfect way to run this episode, actually, would’ve been to keep it secret that Amy and Rory leave. We’d watch most of the running time thinking it was a common or garden adventure, and then BOOM. Completely impossible in the modern climate, and that’s a shame, as it would have blindsided everyone.
The Angels Take A Holiday
The flipside of all the above is, yes, the advertising meant I was expecting more staggering sense of event, and Moffat’s stabs at building one up (ominous comments about “endings”, etc) seemed out of place in an otherwise normal episode. The Weeping Angels make for a cool visual, especially when they take over the Statue of Liberty, but perhaps don’t make for finale-level drama.
Still, it worked well on its own terms, good to see the Angels’ back-in-time trick get interesting uses, and… does this mean the Doctor can never again go to 1938? Under any circumstances? I felt sad at the two obvious scenes, River Song didn’t annoy me for once, not sure the riff about “marriage changing everything” really worked, but good show nonetheless.
And looking back briefly at the five episode mini-series, I’ve enjoyed it. The awkward semi-companion angle with the Ponds was interesting, although only attempting five episodes rather than thirteen was probably wise.
Also pleased they disentangled the arc plot and focused on individual stories. Yes, some parts didn’t work, like the half-baked divorce in Asylum Of The Daleks and lame ending of The Power Of Three, but that’s not a bad hit rate. Looking forward to Christmas and the proper debut of Jenna Louise Coleman. How did you find the Pond-cleaning episode? What about the series so far?
More Doctor Who on Dork Adore | Doctor Who: A Town Called Mercy – Dork Review
Nick Bryan
Nick learned to read and write at an early age. This has developed into an unhealthy need to either write stories or consume them for later dissection. He reviews film and TV on Dork Adore and The Digital Fix, lives in London and enjoys a nice white beer.
Follow Me:
Being Human: Series 3, Episode 4 – Dork Review
Writer Phil Ford talks The Sarah Jane Adventures
Merlin: His Father’s Son – Dork Review
Sherlock: Five things Moffat needs to build a better Holmes
RSS
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
I think I need to see it again, but first impressions were that it was a decent scary episode that just happened to leave us Pondless. Which is preferable to some of the over-done departures of the past (for me, at least).
I was happy with it, yeah. As I say, would’ve been even more impressive if they’d been able to keep it secret, but that’s not really an option.